Posts
LIARS!
It has been a while since the Savannah Morning News has printed a blatant lie – they have been wrong plenty but obvious blatant lies have been thin on the ground until this week.
From the Vox:
"So an insurance company-backed study recommends to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that mammograms are not necessary until you are 50 and self exams are not beneficial? I was not aware a woman between the ages of 40 and 49 could not be stricken by this deadly disease. Blatant greed."
For those of you new to my amber waves of brain – You have a right to your opinion but you do not have the right to pollute the public discourse with false statements of fact. The above is a false statement of fact printed as opinion by an editorial staff that is apparently too lazy to check the details before they print something.
The “study” in question does not exist.
There was no study. There was a recommendation by a panel of doctors and other healthcare workers. They based that recommendation on other people’s research.
“We used 6 established models to estimate the outcomes across 20 mammography screening strategies that vary by age of initiation and cessation and by screening interval among a cohort of U.S. women. The results are intended to contribute to practice and guideline policy debates.”
The sources for the models they created were from scientific studies done primarily in socialist countries or the National Cancer Institute – not from any insurance company.
2. Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002;359:909-19. [PMID: 11918907]
3. Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Duffy SW, Yen MF, Chiang CF, et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:625-51. [PMID: 10943268]
4. Vainio H, Bianchini F, eds. Breast Cancer Screening. International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook on Cancer Prevention, Report No. 7. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2002.
5. Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, Johns L, Waller M, Bobrow L; Trial Management Group. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368:2053-60. [PMID: 17161727]
The group making the recommendations is a pseudo governmental entity established by FEDERAL lawmakers and has no direct links to insurance companies. They also claim that cost-cutting was not their primary concern when writing their report.
The Savannah Morning News should be ashamed - printing this type of lie in the paper adds to the confusion and distrust many people already suffer when it comes to the healthcare debate. Printing lies on the topic at this pivotal time in our country is shameful.
Observe how the drones will swarm when they sense a threat to the hive….
Really y’all? Basing an entire business section on an unconfirmed comment that no one will admit to actually hearing?
Printing testimonials praising a quasigovernmental authority without any examination of the underlying facts or an accounting of that authority’s performance?
This is journalism?
Despite what I was taught on the debate team, I have recently been informed that using rhetorical questions is the sign of a smarta$$ and not the modern polite way to make a point.
I am a smarta$$?
For some reason the Savannah Morning News Editorial folk is circling the wagons around the Savannah Development and Renewal Authority.
“It is believed in some quarters that Mayor Otis Johnson then suggested the City Council look into "defunding" the quasi-government entity at the council retreat next week at St. Simons Island.”
Seriously – that all they got. Somebody says the Mayor said something that they can’t confirm.
Oh and while we're at it... City Council isn't going to St. Simons Island on retreat this year they are staying in Chatham County. At least that is what they talked about at earlier meetings. You know meetings?... where the Savannah Morning News should have reporters in the room but often don't?
This is journalism?
Not only are the origins of this article suspect, the newspaper’s reaction is something akin to killing a fly with a laser guided thermonuclear fission-assisted sledgehammer.
They only quote one person who was actually in the room when the supposed conversation took place – apparently more than 15 people were present – but Ms. Smith-Broady decided to devote most of the article to people who had simply heard the rumor, believed it and were really really angry about it.
Oh yeah the one person who was actually in the room and quoted in the article denies hearing anything like what the paper is claiming.
The only indication that the so-called journalists at the SMN tried to look into the situation at all is this limp excuse:
“The Savannah Government Television broadcast of the work session doesn't include that part of the meeting.”
Didn’t you have a reporter there?
BTW the reason they are having so much trouble finding the details of this supposed situation is because it may have actually happened the week before.
At least part of the conversation Alderman Jackson references in her interview took place during the discussion of capital projects on November 5th.
The Mayor at that time did say he wanted an accounting of activities along the MLK corridor and was displeased with what he sees as at the lack of progress.
I don’t know for sure if he revisited that topic at the last meeting, neither does the paper so they really shouldn't be writing an article about it.
This is NOT JOURNALISM.
Still not feeling bloggy but I feel I simply must call BS on this capper from the story on Georgia Power’s move to a new building downtown:
“Commercial Realtor John Neely, of Colliers Neely Dales in Savannah, called Georgia Power's Abercorn purchase "a vote of confidence in downtown and the future,”…”
Not even close – If this were a commercial entity spending money and moving into swank new digs I might agree. Unfortunately there is no sooth to say here when it is a government sanctioned monopoly immune to market forces so far as its revenue stream is concerned.
Georgia power regularly counts its money in billions – quite literally it makes enough in a month to buy and refurbish that building downtown twice. This does not reflect at all on the market or the downtown economy at all.
Gentle, Genteel and Gentile readers please forgive my slackness – I have been distracted by a family matter that I may or may not share in this forum.
The result of my distraction is that not much can get my ire up right now however there were a couple of things that struck me.
See what you get when you just show up?
Recently I have had many occasions to lament the absence of the media from important meetings at which important things happened that ultimately will impact every single citizen of Savannah.
That was not the case at the most recent City Council Meeting and from that single event the Savannah Morning News has managed to milk three headline-worthy stories and gathered intel to assist them with many more stories.
So far from that single event we had actual news on
Friday 11/6 – Enmark, city to try for compromise for Hampstead station and City suspends D.I. Grill's liquor license
Thursday 11/12 - D.I. Grille can serve liquor until hearing
Sunday 11/15 – Sales tax revenue coming in short
Monday 11/16 - West Savannah neighborhood to see more improvement in 2010
While not all of these saw action at the meeting - the lagging sales tax and the West Savannah renewal plan were discussed by leaders and provided reporters with a starting point for the larger story proving once again that there is tremendous value in just showing up.
Now a couple from the Vox -
"The actors and actresses on the set of 'The Conspirator' could smile, talk to, or acknowledge the fans that are there to admire and flatter them. They should stop being snobs."
Yeah cause if a bunch of people came to the office, restaurant, beauty salon or Wal Mart where you work and just stood there and stared at you – you would totally be all “Hey y’all thanks for coming down here and just standing around while I work.” Ignoramus!
"The difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals recognize the distinct strata of society and desire to address their problems. Conservatives recognize the distinct strata of society and desire to preserve them."
No – the difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals want total control so they can tell you what you can do and conservatives want total control so they can tell you what you can’t do.
Oh… wait that really isn’t a difference is it?
Mother may I break the rules – just a little - just this once – please?
People seem to have a difficult time figuring out my politics when, in my mind at least, it is very simple and clear.
There are Rules. Live by those Rules.
That’s it. Call it playground logic if you will.
Armed with that little insight you can see why this little piece of propaganda from the Savannah Morning News had me boiling:
“SAVANNAH CITY Council should either approve a rezoning at White Bluff and Hampstead, or buy the land from the developer.”
Partly I am mad cause they are wrong – partly because the editorial staff presented a whole page of wrong under a bigas animated banner ad for Enmark- the owner of the land.
This goes back to that whole Enmark thing from last week’s city council meeting.
Enmark is asking for permission to break the zoning law on a piece of land in a neighborhood. The paper would have you believe that is not only okay but their GAWD given right.
City leaders can't preclude property owners from the rightful use of their land indefinitely.
Rightful use? So, according to the paper, City Council has lost the power to enforce zoning laws? When did this happen?
Does this mean I can pursue my lifelong dream of operating a deer processing/taxidermy shop in the heart of Ardsley Park. I can put in the Helicopter landing pad I’ve always wanted?
Oh but no… Enmark is going to enhance the neighborhood by breaking the zoning laws.
“That Enmark is moving to get the rezoning anyway is a testament to its corporate stewardship.
The company has also pledged to build a store with a more residential-looking design, muted colors, and a single low sign on the White Bluff side of the property.”
Okay… see Enmark knew the zoning when they bought the land.
Everyone involved including Enmark says they can build the station they want without breaking the zoning laws but we are supposed to applaud because they want to break the zoning laws?
The paper tries to do a little MPC dance pointing out the “transitional”
nature of the area as an excuse to allow further commercial encroachment into
the neighborhood.
Doesn’t that just push the transitional part into the
residential part?
Where do we stop the transitioning part?
Will there be any houses left?
UPDATE:
This past Thursday’s City Council meeting is up on the web for all to see now.
The file claims it was created on Friday – but was not posted until this morning.
Skip ahead to a about 1:24:00 to see Alderman Clifton Jones peel back the curtain on what’s been going on over at the Metropolitan Planning Commission.
“In meeting with the neighbors I found that the MPC was responsible for encouraging Enmark to move into this area and intrude in that block. In my opinion I find that awful unusual. I did not know they made that type of recommendations but in this particular instance they made a recommendation. The MPC did - the staff I imagine because that is the way it is in this report.”
“…they told me there was a sign posted on the property - “Ben Farmer Realty”. So I checked it out and then we’re talking about a grand conflict of interest because I think Mr. Farmer had something to do with the very motion that got this where it is today.
I found that through his company there was an agent by the name of Carl Francis that actually sold this property to Enmark.
If I am wrong I got the wrong information but if I’m right then this is the information that I’ve been given. Mr. Mayor I’m saying all this because I don’t want to see this property affect a whole lot of other properties in the City of Savannah. If Enmark is able to further encroach into this area then what about the rest of Savannah?”
So the only thing Alderman Jones said that is in dispute is the part about a specific agent from Ben Farmer Realty that “sold this property to Enmark”
Mr. Farmer says that never happened. Okay – but what about the rest of it?
ADDENDUM: I have the direct quotes now posted at: http://stupidsavannah.vox.com/library/post/est%C3%BApido-savannah---monday-november-09-2009-13559-pm.html
A whiff of scandal
I am just going off of what I have read. I don’t like to do that because much of what I read is wrong. In this instance I have no choice as the City of Savannah is not following its policy of re-broadcasting and posting the regularly scheduled City Council meetings to the web within days of the original broadcast.
I don’t want to belabor that sudden change in public information policy because I don’t want to get distracted by minutia but I missed the meeting and haven’t been able to see it yet and am not as well armed with the facts as I would like to be going into this. That being said I sally forth.
Go Clifton – Go Clifton It’s Your Birthday! We gon' party like it's your birthday. We gon' sip on Bacardi like it's your birthday.
Clifton Jones called THE MAN out -- right up in the middle of City Council!!! He put it right out on Front Street for everybody to see (unless they were counting on seeing it on the rebroadcast or the web).
“As council members debated the rezoning, Alderman Clifton Jones repeated and expanded on an allegation from one of the residents.
He stated that Ben Farmer, a local real estate agent and member of the Chatham County-Savannah Metropolitan Planning Commission, had an agent who had sold the property to Enmark.”
This is the Boring Background Part: Enmark says it wants to throw up another quality gas station at the corner of Hampstead and White Bluff. They want to take a bite out of the residential property in the neighborhood to do it.
MPC staff and of course the industry-heavy MPC signed off on the plan.
This despite objections from 99.999% of the people in the neighborhood and pleas for patience from the city. It seems the parcels in question are in the Project Derenne study area and if Enmark would just wait they would have a better idea of how the changes in the area might change the landscape and the property they own there.
Thus the request to violate the zoning laws came before
council with great big green checkmarks from both MPC Staff and the MPC but
with a great big red X from City Manager Michael Brown because the whole thing
may become moot if the city takes out the land in question to build a new road for Project Derenne.
Enmark is simply being asked to wait which they seem unwilling to do.
The More Interesting Bits Resume Here: The reason I’ve waited days to report this is because the two emails I got from people in the room suggest that the paper overstated Clifton’s accusations. My sources say he simply pointed out that Ben Farmer had a sign on the lot in question and that an agent of his company had represented the property and that the property next door is owned by Enmark.
“Farmer, reached after the meeting, said the claim was untrue. He once had a listing on the property, but it expired with no sale.
"We had nothing to do with that transaction. If I had I would have disclosed it."
So he DID represent the land at some point but he wasn’t the one who actually did the deal.
Interesting split of the hair there.
I would like to ask Mr. Farmer how many parcels of land either owned by or purchased by Enmark has his company represented and profited from?
My Take –
Metropolitan Planning Commissioner Ben Farmer has a conflict of interest.
That is a broad statement of fact. Let’s drill down a bit.
As a real estate mogul Ben Farmer has a vested interest in making sure parcels of land have as many potential uses as possible so as to more easily sell said parcels. This is in direct conflict with his role on the Metropolitan Planning Commission which is a pseudo regulatory body partially responsible for enforcing zoning limitations on the potential uses of parcels of land.
I have pointed out this conflict in the past. Mr. Farmer is not the only one on the board with such conflicted interests but he is by far the most outspoken and I would argue the most successful in both his business and in voting in favor of variances that allow property owners to violate zoning regulations.
Enmark owns lots and lots of land; Farmer represents lots and lots of land owners. It would be odd if there was no interaction between the two.
Mr. Farmer should never place himself in a position to make any decisions that would profit any of his business associates past or present, directly or indirectly.
As the apostle pointed out to the good people of Thessaloniki so long ago – “Abstain from all appearance of evil.” In other words if it even looks like you might have a conflict of interest you should probably step away.
Ben Farmer needs to step away and somebody needs to buy Clifton Jones a drink for having the brass eggs to point it out.
Is it only in the TV business that you can lose money and market share and get a promotion?
This blurb about Savannah’s alwaysabridesmaid WSAV-TV caught my eye because the guy who has overseen the decline of the station’s fortunes over the past three years, Brad Moses, is being rewarded with a trip to a much larger market.
"During the past three years, Brad has provided exceptional leadership in all areas of broadcast management as general manager for WSAV," said Media General North Carolina President/Market Leader James R. Conschafter.”
Really Connie?
Cause the way I hear it, in addition to the layoffs imposed
on the station from those corporate geniuses up in Richmond, Moses couldn’t
keep a sales staff, fired a veteran anchor who was then hired at WJCL on the
same day and somehow managed to run off the entire marketing department, the crime
reporter, neighborhood news reporter, weekend anchor and sports director as well as the executive
producer.
I can’t give you a link to the ratings, they cost money and aren’t shared freely, but my understanding is they have been flat or down significantly during his entire tenure.
I guess the good news in all this is that WSAV may improve
under Moses successor; it certainly can’t get any worse. We need to say a prayer for the folks in Raleigh.
From the Vox - Dumb, Dumber and downright Stupid:
"The reason we have so much foreign trade today is greed. American merchants just want to make more money."
Yes. And?
For this little piece of ignorance I blame the schools. They apparently are no longer teaching the basics of economics.
Supply and demand… capitalism… is this ringing any bells?
"Grocery stores don't seem to be competing for our business. I'm clipping coupons and trying to save like a desperate fool. They have us figured out, charging $3.55 or more for a bag of chips."
Let me get this straight… you are clipping coupons and
beeatching about it because you can’t afford a bag of chips? A bag of chips
that, when consumed, will provide to your body absolutely no nutritional value.
A bag of chips that, when consumed, will probably make you less healthy due to trans-fats
and sodium levels and general greasiness?
How can you look at that level of intelligence and still believe in “survival of the fittest”?
"The caller who said he wouldn't buy a Chevrolet because of the stimulus funds doesn't understand that, without stimulus funds, there wouldn't be a Chevrolet to buy."
Yeah…I think that’s what they meant. There shouldn’t be a Chevy unless Chevy can survive without being propped up with tax money.
Savannah’s self-appointed GAY spokesperson Kevin Clark is at it again – This time he’s right – for the most part.
Clark is beeatching about how a group of gay “leafletters” were treated at the recent innovation awards. The police acted “stupidly”, to borrow a phrase from the president, when they rudely and unconstitutionally sent The GAYS away from the public streets and sidewalks where the awards were handed out.
However he makes a key mistake in is tirade that the paper should have cleared up or excised from this SAVANNAH MORNING NEWS piece.
Moreover, why did prominent politicians, including Alderman Tony Thomas and County Commission Chairman Pete Liakakis, who were in attendance, stand by and watch as their police committed this embarrassment?
Mr. Thomas and Mr. LIakakis could not, by law, say boo to the cops in this or any other situation.
The SAVANNAH MORNING NEWS knows this, they have lauded this particular part of the Manager Form of Government and they have berated the City Council for Micro Managing when they dared to ask a difficult question of the police chief because they simply wanted to know how many cops we have and where they were assigned.
The paper should NEVER have printed this unfounded accusation.
They know full well that repeating Clark’s criticism makes two electeds look as though they don’t care when the truth is they were as powerless as The GAYS.
In the city’s case Aldermen are strictly forbidden to interfere with the day to day operations of any city department. On a bigger scale anyone – ANYONE – interfering with a police officer duties in just about any situation could be charged with obstruction.
Don’t like the idea that the police can break the law and trample your rights and no one can stop them on the spot?
Tough!
This is the price you pay to live in the false belief that you and your family are safe.
One from the VOX:
"The news told of a young lady being gang raped as a crowd of chicken livered onlookers watched. How revolting and cowardly. That would not have happened back in my day."
When exactly was your “day” - 1964 perhaps? That is the year Kitty Genovese was stabbed and suffocated on her own blood within site and earshot of more than a dozen people who did little or nothing to help her.
Or perhaps your “day” was the 1920’s or 1930’s or perhaps 1940’s or 1950’s when groups of people banded together to hang individuals from trees until their necks broke or they choked to death. No one lifted a hand to stop them and instead cheered them on back in those days.
We are a violent group of animals. We have always been a violent group of animals and we have always run away from our fellow animal’s problems when we have the opportunity.
That is why we survived so long and so well among faster and deadlier groups of animals.
Don’t play dumb! The exact same levels of violence and cowardice exist in each and every one of us yesterday, today and tomorrow.
For the first time in a long time I was at a complete loss for words but oddly proud of myself at the same time.
So what did you do on Halloween?
I decided to stay in and get caught up on what happened at the quarterly town hall meeting they had over to the civic center the other night. Scary dull I know.
You might be asking yourself “what town hall meeting?” I certainly was since I saw nothing on it from my usual news sources. I managed to find a blurb that it was coming up but no coverage of the actual meeting.
Turns out I didn’t miss much, however the Savannah Morning News could have used this as an excuse to report the current and future economic state of the city -- since they missed that story at the last City Council and still have yet to report it. Head Penny Pincher Chris Morrill provided a brief budget explanation for the apparently very small crowd of neighbors who showed up.
Despite the fact that Morrill called it “The Great Recession” , which is hyperbolic, his talk was to the point and chock full of as yet unreported, important information about how all that money we give to the local government is being spent and who might get laid off and what services might get cut and such.
Besides that we got the regular “Here’s What We’ve Done For You Lately” somewhat self-serving priorities bit from the bureaucracy and a talk about the as yet completely ineffective Youth Futures Authority and something about Black Male Achievement which I skipped over because I have already achieved what I plan to achieve. You too can skip right over that and the other stuff that doesn’t grab you with handy dandy index points provided at the link posted above.
The other thing that I did NOT skip over was the bit from the Housing Authority of Savannah. They are the Public Housing Folk basically the local arm of the Housing and Urban Development department of the Federal Government.
It looked like it would be a right interesting historic perspective on what the HAS has done since its founding back in the 1930s. And it was, interesting I mean, right up until they got to the bit about Stubbs Tower.
Ms. Earline Davis the executive Director of the HAS described a slide she indicated was an Ad for Stubbs Tower at the time of its construction.
“This is Stubbs Towers the first high rise senior building built by the housing authority. For those of you who remember Stubbs Towers, I want to read
for you what is on the literature ‘Move up to Stubbs -Stubbs Towers offers cutting edge high rise living with breath taking views an exciting floor plan with the slickest contemporary design and the clever use of modern materials and space made for today’s living.’…”
I almost swallowed my tongue.
I created that ad for this blog in 2007. It is not a 1960's era ad for a High Rise Senior Living Facility-it is a fake, a fraud, a poor attempt at funny photoshopping.
I don’t know how to react to this, I mean, do I need to put
disclaimers on what are obviously photo fakery? Should I be proud the work was so convincing?
I feel I have to point it out but, given the anonymous nature
of my work, I can’t very well call up Ms. Davis and tell her.
So I will leave it to you my dear readers to inform her, as gently as you can, that she should remove that slide from future presentations and should check her sources more carefully in the future.
I am a little ashamed that I was at the root of one of those internet artifacts that becomes historical fact simply because no one knows any better.
I also am a little proud that my work could be mistaken for the real thing…is that wrong?
